Avenger Street 220 review after 600kms ride to Wayanad
When the WayanadOnWheels trip was being planned, I had an
option to choose a bike. I could have opted for Royal Enfields- classic 350,
Thunderbird 350, TB 500, Classic 500. But I was drawn towards the Avenger 220
Cruiser. I had never ridden it, so I was inclined to try it. Bajaj Avenger 220
is slightly less powered compared to any Royal Enfield, but then Avenger is lot
lighter (around 37kg lighter compared to Classic 350). Because of this I was hopeful it can perform better than its big
brother bullets, both in terms of agility, top speed and riding comfort. Was it
a good choice to opt for Avenger instead of Royal Enfield? Read this post to
find out.
On the day of the ride, I was assigned an Avenger 220
Street, not the Cruiser version. I had liked the big glass shield available in
cruiser and also the backrest for pillion- both are optional extras for Cruise though
but missing in Street version. Avenger is custom built for long distance
riding. Sitting posture in this bike is lot different from any other bike. At
first it feels awkward to sit in a strange position but over a kew kms, rider
gets used to it.
Over next 3 days, I rode the Street 220 for about 600+ kms. On
Day 1, we left from Electronic city and hit NICE Road. While bullet riders
zoomed ahead fast, I figured out that Avenger’s comfort zone is at around 80-90
kmph. Though it has a top speed of 120 kmph on paper, the one I was riding was
struggling beyond 100kmph. If pushed really really hard it would touch 110kmph,
but otherwise Avenger is more suitable for leisure ride at slower speed, than
in company of fast riding bullets or pulsars. My Apache 160 is capable of reaching
115 kmph at ease if given some straight road. Point to be noted that even
bullets have their top speed at around 110 kmph. Classic 350, Thunderbird 350
etc max out at around 110 kmph and start to vibrate heavily. May be 500cc
versions can do a bit better, but not much. Despite having similar top speed,
bullets have higher torque, can pull out/accelerate much faster compared to
Avenger, putting avenger at a slight disadvantage. I would need some straight
road to catch up with the group or more frequent downshifting was needed.
Avenger's instrument cluster is in two sets. First one is the speedo, odo and trip meter, in its normal position, whereas second set of displays fuel gauge, turn indicator, high beam and neutral indicator are on fuel tank. This needs some tilting of head to view these, which means taking eyes totally off the road for a second or two. All other bikes show all display elements together right above the headlamp between handlebars, which is easier to view while riding, in my opinion.
On a good note, changing to neutral or viewing neutral is lot easier in Avenger. In thunderbird, neutral display is hidden behind a dark glass, making it hard to spot. In bullet it is slightly better, but most bullet models do not have a fuel gauge display.
Ignition key is on the side,had to be extra mindful to take it out. There's no central locking in Avenger. Handlebar needs to locked manually. Avenger gets an oil cooled engine, but the oil cooler unit felt so small and namesake, most of the cooling I guess was happening via air only.
Saakshi Rajat was riding pillion with me during the onward journey. After about 250kms, she preferred to get into a car. During return journey she rode with Sameera on classic 500. I asked which one of the two was more comfortable for pillion rider- she didn't feel any noticeable difference between the two bikes, as a pillion rider. Both models have step up pillion seats, good in height but not as wide a rider seats. RE bikes are a bit taller.
Should have taken more photos of the bike. Realized I haven't taken any decent photo of Street 220, except a few casual ones.
Riding comfort and handling was fine. I got used to the sitting posture and controls. Avenger is lot lighter, hence easier to lift or handle for average build bikers. I think the exact posture can be adjusted a bit to suit owner's body ergonomics- do check with Bajaj dealer on this. Avenger gets wider rear tyres, tubeless tyres are more easier to patch up in case of puncture. I wonder why RE is not switching to alloy wheels and tubeless tyres yet. We did a fair bit of off-roading between Dare5000 Nare camp's parking lot and blue ginger resort. Avenger was easy to manage on bad roads, but doesn't have the ruggedness of a bullet, hence need to be ridden more slower and carefully.
I asked a friend, named Vinod Kini who owns a Pulsar 220 about the top speed of his bike. He said 140 kmph+. Avenger gets the same engine, but probably tuned for mileage and riding comfort than speed. Better aerodynamics and fairings in Pulsar 220 also contribute to its higher top speed.
Avenger's instrument cluster is in two sets. First one is the speedo, odo and trip meter, in its normal position, whereas second set of displays fuel gauge, turn indicator, high beam and neutral indicator are on fuel tank. This needs some tilting of head to view these, which means taking eyes totally off the road for a second or two. All other bikes show all display elements together right above the headlamp between handlebars, which is easier to view while riding, in my opinion.
On a good note, changing to neutral or viewing neutral is lot easier in Avenger. In thunderbird, neutral display is hidden behind a dark glass, making it hard to spot. In bullet it is slightly better, but most bullet models do not have a fuel gauge display.
Ignition key is on the side,had to be extra mindful to take it out. There's no central locking in Avenger. Handlebar needs to locked manually. Avenger gets an oil cooled engine, but the oil cooler unit felt so small and namesake, most of the cooling I guess was happening via air only.
Saakshi Rajat was riding pillion with me during the onward journey. After about 250kms, she preferred to get into a car. During return journey she rode with Sameera on classic 500. I asked which one of the two was more comfortable for pillion rider- she didn't feel any noticeable difference between the two bikes, as a pillion rider. Both models have step up pillion seats, good in height but not as wide a rider seats. RE bikes are a bit taller.
Should have taken more photos of the bike. Realized I haven't taken any decent photo of Street 220, except a few casual ones.
Riding comfort and handling was fine. I got used to the sitting posture and controls. Avenger is lot lighter, hence easier to lift or handle for average build bikers. I think the exact posture can be adjusted a bit to suit owner's body ergonomics- do check with Bajaj dealer on this. Avenger gets wider rear tyres, tubeless tyres are more easier to patch up in case of puncture. I wonder why RE is not switching to alloy wheels and tubeless tyres yet. We did a fair bit of off-roading between Dare5000 Nare camp's parking lot and blue ginger resort. Avenger was easy to manage on bad roads, but doesn't have the ruggedness of a bullet, hence need to be ridden more slower and carefully.
I asked a friend, named Vinod Kini who owns a Pulsar 220 about the top speed of his bike. He said 140 kmph+. Avenger gets the same engine, but probably tuned for mileage and riding comfort than speed. Better aerodynamics and fairings in Pulsar 220 also contribute to its higher top speed.
During the 3 day #WayanadOnWheels trip, I swapped Avenger Street
220 once with Niranjan, who was riding Thunderbird 500. He wanted his bike back
within few minutes as he found Avenger too uncomfortable. Later during return journey I also swapped
once with JP’s Thunderbird 350. He was kind enough to let me ride TB for about 50
odd kms, after which he expressed his desire to ditch the Avenger and get back
on his Thunderbird. So obviously those who’re used to Royal Enfield will never
seriously consider Avenger, even if it has some advantages (listed below) over RE.
From what I have experienced and observed, below is a quick
listing of advantages & disadvantages of Bajaj Avenger Street 220 compared
to various bullet models
Bike
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Avenger Street 220
|
|
|
RE Bullet 350/
TB 350
|
|
|
On the last day, when the Avenger Street 220 didn’t start,
Danny from ONN Bikes had to push it down slope and start. Self start needs more
care and is not 100% reliable. Not having a kick starter can have its drawbacks. If there was no slope to slide down, you will need few guys to push the bike to start it.
Overall, I did manage to stay with the convoy of bullets while riding the Avenger 220 but had to push the bike bit harder beyond its comfort zone. If I was all alone, probably I would have ridden
a bit slower, enjoying the ride, stopping for photos or diverting to nearby
attractions etc.
From price point, Avenger costs just half of what a Classic 350 costs. So while criticizing it I should keep in mind that Avenger is lot cheaper, so from value for money perspective- for those who are not hard core fans of Royal Enfield and need a cheaper cruiser bike, (or a city bike which will be used only occasionally for long rides) may be Avenger is worth consideration. I feel Avenger owners/riders will enjoy their ride if ridden with the company of other avengers, all going lot slower, enjoying the ride and journey. In company of faster bikes or even not so fast Royal Enfields, Avenger is probably not a very good choice. Of course you don’t have to take my word for it. Before making purchase decision, you can rent Avenger from ONNBikes for a day or two, ride it around, may be long distance and check how comfortable you are with the bike. If happy, then buy.
What's your take? Would you prefer Avenger over bullets? Friend Rajesh owns Street 150- read his review here.
The bike I rode for the Wayanad trip was provided by OnnBikes. You can rent Avenger, Royal Enfield and several other commuter bikes and scooters from Onn Bikes, a fast growing Bike rental startup. They have cheaper rates, simpler process and fair range of choices to select from.
Similar posts: 10 features available in Hero Splendor, not available in Harley Davidson Street 750 * RE Bullets- hate it or love it- can't ignore it * HD Street 750 review * Royal Enfield Factory visit * Ride Thailand Biking experience * Royal Brothers Bike renal experience in Phuket, Thailand *
From price point, Avenger costs just half of what a Classic 350 costs. So while criticizing it I should keep in mind that Avenger is lot cheaper, so from value for money perspective- for those who are not hard core fans of Royal Enfield and need a cheaper cruiser bike, (or a city bike which will be used only occasionally for long rides) may be Avenger is worth consideration. I feel Avenger owners/riders will enjoy their ride if ridden with the company of other avengers, all going lot slower, enjoying the ride and journey. In company of faster bikes or even not so fast Royal Enfields, Avenger is probably not a very good choice. Of course you don’t have to take my word for it. Before making purchase decision, you can rent Avenger from ONNBikes for a day or two, ride it around, may be long distance and check how comfortable you are with the bike. If happy, then buy.
What's your take? Would you prefer Avenger over bullets? Friend Rajesh owns Street 150- read his review here.
The bike I rode for the Wayanad trip was provided by OnnBikes. You can rent Avenger, Royal Enfield and several other commuter bikes and scooters from Onn Bikes, a fast growing Bike rental startup. They have cheaper rates, simpler process and fair range of choices to select from.
Similar posts: 10 features available in Hero Splendor, not available in Harley Davidson Street 750 * RE Bullets- hate it or love it- can't ignore it * HD Street 750 review * Royal Enfield Factory visit * Ride Thailand Biking experience * Royal Brothers Bike renal experience in Phuket, Thailand *
Avenger 150 street is definitely not for long-distance driving. By long-distance I mean more than 50-60 KM at a stretch. But I found it an excellent option for riding within the city, even in thick traffic. Except the long form-factor parking is sometimes a hassle, but that also gives it a great look - so I can live with it.
ReplyDeleteAm not sure about 220 street or cruise as I have not driven either. If the primary application is long-distance driving, I feel, RE maybe a better option. But for driving within the city, Avenger 150 street is my recommendation. I love it :)
Destination Infinity
Thanks Rajesh. Yes, I am aware of your review n feedback. Thanks
DeleteI like bullet standard but now a days classic is more popular here in Chandigarh and Punjab. Because of my bike passion we started bike rental company here in Chandigarh. As per my two years experience people like bullet 500 and 350 classic only.
ReplyDeleteRegards
Royal bike rentals.com
Best wishes to your bike rental company.
DeleteI own both and to be Frank avenger 220 cruise gives me less fatigue on long highway trips.
ReplyDeleteThanks-because of its light weight and more comfortable cruising seating position I guess?
DeleteI never thought I would get to read such a specific post! Works great for my requirements.
ReplyDeleteGreat. So what did you decide? Buying Avenger or bullet?
Deletei have already purchase Avenger Street 220 and driven around 16k till now.
DeleteGreat. How's the experience?
DeleteThanks for the information. I am planning for a solo trip, i am confused to choose RE or Avenger. I got some points clear... thanks a lot.
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure
Delete